Working Demos · AI-Powered

Three tools. Each one a proof of concept for what intelligent asset advisory looks like.

These are live, interactive examples — not mockups. Enter your own asset data and see what the AI produces. Each is aligned to ISO 55000 / ISO 55001 and designed for mid-market ANZ operators.

Demo 01 · Lifecycle Cost Analysis · ISO 55001 Clause 6.2

Replace vs. maintain: seeing the real cost.

CAPEX decisions in mid-market organisations almost always undercount the full lifecycle cost of the replacement option. This tool takes your asset parameters and uses AI to project a Total Cost of Ownership model across the asset's remaining life — separating acquisition, operation, maintenance, and end-of-life into a comparable view. The goal isn't a precise number; it's a defensible structure for the decision.

01

Define the asset and its context

Asset type, current age, replacement cost, and operational environment. The AI anchors assumptions to your specific industry and asset class.

02

Set your cost parameters

Annual OPEX, current maintenance spend, and expected failure frequency. Rough numbers are fine — the structure matters more than false precision.

03

Get the lifecycle cost breakdown

The AI returns a projected TCO, a cost-component breakdown, the NPV of both options, and a recommended decision with ISO 55001 clause linkage.

lifecycle-cost-calculator.ai — ISO 55001 · Clause 6.2
12yr
25yr
Demo 02 · Maintenance Strategy · ISO 55001 Clause 8.3

From reactive firefighting to a defensible maintenance strategy.

Most mid-market asset owners default to time-based or reactive maintenance because developing a proper strategy takes specialist time they don't have. This tool takes your asset class, criticality, and operating context — and generates a structured maintenance strategy recommendation across the four main approaches, with RCM-aligned failure mode analysis and inspection interval guidance.

01

Describe the asset and operating context

Asset type, criticality, current strategy, and consequence of failure. The more specific you are, the more targeted the output.

02

Set criticality and monitoring capability

Whether the asset is condition-monitorable shapes which strategies are viable. The AI adjusts recommendations based on what's feasible for your context.

03

Receive a strategy recommendation with failure mode analysis

The output maps failure modes to maintenance tasks, specifies inspection intervals, and flags where a Digital Twin could improve the strategy.

maintenance-strategy-generator.ai — RCM aligned · ISO 55001 Cl.8.3
Strategy framework — the AI selects and weights across these four
🔵 Condition-Based (CBM)
Intervene when condition indicators cross thresholds. Requires monitoring capability. Best for critical, monitorable assets.
🟡 Time-Based (TBM)
Fixed interval overhauls regardless of condition. Predictable cost, lower efficiency. Appropriate where failure consequences are moderate.
🟠 Predictive (PdM)
Machine learning on sensor/operational data to predict remaining useful life. High value for assets with digital twin capability.
⚪ Run-to-Failure (RTF)
Allow failure and repair. Only appropriate for non-critical, low consequence, easily replaced assets with redundancy.
Demo 03 · Digital Twin Readiness · ISO 15288 / DE

Are you ready for a Digital Twin? Find out before you spend.

Most Digital Twin projects in mid-market organisations fail at implementation — not because the technology is wrong, but because the foundational data and process conditions aren't ready. This diagnostic assesses your organisation's readiness across six dimensions, scores each one, and produces a prioritised roadmap for closing the gaps before you invest in DT technology.

01

Describe your current data and systems state

Asset register quality, sensor coverage, CMMS maturity, and data governance. Be honest — the diagnostic value comes from accurate inputs.

02

Rate your organisational readiness

Process maturity, change capability, and strategic alignment. A technically-ready organisation with low change capability will struggle to extract value from a DT.

03

Receive a readiness score and prioritised roadmap

The AI scores six dimensions, identifies the biggest gaps, and produces a phased approach — starting with what will have the most impact on readiness.

digital-twin-readiness.ai — 6-dimension diagnostic
Rate each dimension — drag slider to reflect current state
2/5
2/5
2/5
1/5
2/5
3/5
Live readiness preview
40%
READY
Foundational gaps exist. Prioritise asset register and data governance before DT investment.